|
Advertising by Google
Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná
Below, results of a survey conducted by Embratur, the Brazilian Tourism Office, about how foreigner travellers evaluate the city of Foz do Iguaçu, in the State of Paraná.
Read more about the Embratur survey on International Tourism in Brazil.
|
Purpose of the trip (%)
|
|
Leisure / Holidays/ Vacation
|
80.47 |
|
Visits fo Family and/or Friends
|
7.41 |
|
Business / Conventions
|
8.75 |
|
Study / Teaching / Research
|
1.35 |
|
Health Treatment
|
0.34 |
|
Religion / Pilgrimage
|
0.34 |
|
Others
|
1.35 |
|
Factors of influence in the decision to visit Brazil (%)
|
|
Information from friends
|
46.02 |
|
Folder / Printed Guides
|
18.14 |
|
Internet
|
9.29 |
|
Magazines
|
6.64 |
|
Television
|
5.31 |
|
Newspapers
|
4.87 |
|
Other means of communication
|
9.73 |
|
Age brackets (%)
|
|
18 - 27 y.o.
|
23.59 |
|
28 - 45 y.o.
|
32.89 |
|
46 - 65 y.o.
|
36.21 |
|
over 65 y.o.
|
7.31 |
|
Level of Education (%)
|
|
Elementary
|
9.93 |
|
Intermediary
|
29.47 |
|
Superior
|
60.60 |
|
Occupation (%)
|
|
Retired
|
11.63 |
|
Student
|
9.97 |
|
Housewife
|
6.31 |
|
Trade sector
|
4.98 |
|
Teacher / Professor
|
4.67 |
|
Engineer
|
4.65 |
|
Civil servant
|
1.66 |
|
Companionship (%)
|
|
Alone
|
14.86 |
|
With family
|
43.92 |
|
With friends
|
30.07 |
|
Travel package
|
11.15 |
|
Average annual income
|
US$ 24,141.49
|
|
Organization of the trip (%)
|
|
Not organized by travel agencies
|
44.04 |
|
Organized by travel agencies
|
55.96 |
|
Repeat trips to Brazil (%)
|
|
First time trip
|
69.21 |
|
Not first trip
|
30.79 |
|
Intention of returning to Brazil (%)
|
|
Have the intention to return to Brazil
|
90.67 |
|
Do not have the intention to return to Brazil
|
9.33 |
|
Averagage staying
|
4.10 days
|
|
Average spending per capita
|
US$ 56.08
|
|
Other cities visited (%)
|
|
Rio de Janeiro
|
57.62 |
|
Salvador
|
19.21 |
|
Sao Paulo
|
18.87 |
|
Manaus
|
9.60 |
|
Florianopolis
|
7.95 |
|
Parati
|
6.95 |
|
Camboriu
|
2.32 |
|
Lodging (%)
|
|
Hotels
|
83.90 |
|
Family / Friends
|
11.02 |
|
Camping
|
5.08 |
|
Hotels Evaluation (%) |
| Evaluation |
Hygiene |
Services |
Price |
| Excellent |
34.29 |
28.57 |
27.59 |
| Good |
61.90 |
66.67 |
58.62 |
| Regular |
3.81 |
4.76 |
6.92 |
| Bad |
- |
- |
6.87 |
|
Restaurants Evaluation (%) |
| Evaluation |
Cleanness |
Services |
Food Quality |
Prices |
Typical food |
| Excellent |
17.27 |
17.59 |
24.04 |
14.15 |
26.76 |
| Good |
75.45 |
76.85 |
71.15 |
66.98 |
64.79 |
| Regular |
6.36 |
4.63 |
3.85 |
16.98 |
8.45 |
| Bad |
0.92 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
1.89 |
- |
|
Tourist Information (%) |
| Evaluation |
Availability of information |
Accuracy of information |
| Excellent |
6.45 |
16.13 |
| Good |
67.74 |
64.52 |
| Regular |
16.13 |
16.12 |
| Bad |
9.68 |
3.23 |
|
Tourist Guides (%) |
| Evaluation |
Services |
Time keeping |
| Excellent |
38.75 |
33.75 |
| Good |
55.00 |
57.50 |
| Regular |
5.00 |
7.50 |
| Bad |
1.25 |
1.25 |
|
Highways (%) |
| Evaluation |
Maintenaince |
Signalization |
Points of support |
| Excellent |
8.47 |
9.09 |
5.13 |
| Good |
81.36 |
87.27 |
92.31 |
| Regular |
6.78 |
1.84 |
2.56 |
| Bad |
3.39 |
1.80 |
- |
|
Biggest complaints from tourists (%) |
|
Taxi |
9.76 |
|
Safety |
8.65 |
|
Telecommunications |
8.33 |
|
Public Transportation |
4.92 |
|
Dirtiness |
3.36 |
|
Nightlife |
1.39 |
|
Tourist information |
0.96 |
|
Meeting of expectations (%) |
| Expectations exceeded |
39.20 |
|
Expectations fully met |
48.84 |
|
Expectations partially met |
10.30 |
|
Disappointed |
1.66 |
Back to Top
|